Comments on: Murphy’s Logic

By: patty flores

patty flores — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 03:10:30 +0000

Its ok I guess….heard better though

By: carbonferum

carbonferum — Sun, 11 Oct 2009 11:49:33 +0000

haha.. For those who don’t get it:

have dog=>have children=>have wife=>heterosexual
therefore the logic is:

have dog=>heterosexual

not have dog => not heterosexual => homosexual => gay
no dog => gay

that’s logic.. haha

By: tsion sifue

tsion sifue — Mon, 10 Aug 2009 13:40:17 +0000

that wasn’t funny not even close.

By: Jay

Jay — Mon, 06 Jul 2009 16:04:34 +0000

not to be mean but that wasnt that funny

By: Yermom

Yermom — Thu, 04 Jun 2009 22:11:53 +0000

Hahahahhahahahahhahahahah

By: Ralph*

Ralph* — Wed, 04 Feb 2009 14:45:41 +0000

Tim sucks balls!! =) ha ha

By: Tim

Tim — Fri, 23 Jan 2009 14:01:29 +0000

Buy yourself a brain

By: Tim

Tim — Fri, 23 Jan 2009 14:00:32 +0000

I rd logic..ummm….luks lyk ur retarded

By: Joe

Joe — Wed, 14 Jan 2009 15:21:30 +0000

It was logical to assume that the ending would be a drag…

By: JACKASSONFIRE!

JACKASSONFIRE! — Fri, 05 Dec 2008 14:09:50 +0000

SUCKED B@LLS AND THEY COULD HAVE BEEN WAY BETTER STARTED ENDED REALLY SH*TTY. WOULDA BEEN WAY BETTER IF THEY USED FAG NOT “GAY” AND IF MURPHY HAD SAW HIS NEIGHBOR THROUGH THE WINDOW F*CKIN ANOTHER DUDE !!